Reaction participants Show >> << Hide
- Name help_outline H2O Identifier CHEBI:15377 (Beilstein: 3587155; CAS: 7732-18-5) help_outline Charge 0 Formula H2O InChIKeyhelp_outline XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N SMILEShelp_outline [H]O[H] 2D coordinates Mol file for the small molecule Search links Involved in 6,204 reaction(s) Find molecules that contain or resemble this structure Find proteins in UniProtKB for this molecule
- Name help_outline O2 Identifier CHEBI:15379 (CAS: 7782-44-7) help_outline Charge 0 Formula O2 InChIKeyhelp_outline MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N SMILEShelp_outline O=O 2D coordinates Mol file for the small molecule Search links Involved in 2,709 reaction(s) Find molecules that contain or resemble this structure Find proteins in UniProtKB for this molecule
- Name help_outline sulfite Identifier CHEBI:17359 (CAS: 14265-45-3) help_outline Charge -2 Formula O3S InChIKeyhelp_outline LSNNMFCWUKXFEE-UHFFFAOYSA-L SMILEShelp_outline [O-]S([O-])=O 2D coordinates Mol file for the small molecule Search links Involved in 60 reaction(s) Find molecules that contain or resemble this structure Find proteins in UniProtKB for this molecule
- Name help_outline H2O2 Identifier CHEBI:16240 (Beilstein: 3587191; CAS: 7722-84-1) help_outline Charge 0 Formula H2O2 InChIKeyhelp_outline MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N SMILEShelp_outline [H]OO[H] 2D coordinates Mol file for the small molecule Search links Involved in 449 reaction(s) Find molecules that contain or resemble this structure Find proteins in UniProtKB for this molecule
- Name help_outline sulfate Identifier CHEBI:16189 (Beilstein: 3648446; CAS: 14808-79-8) help_outline Charge -2 Formula O4S InChIKeyhelp_outline QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L SMILEShelp_outline [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O 2D coordinates Mol file for the small molecule Search links Involved in 91 reaction(s) Find molecules that contain or resemble this structure Find proteins in UniProtKB for this molecule
Cross-references
RHEA:24600 | RHEA:24601 | RHEA:24602 | RHEA:24603 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reaction direction help_outline | undefined | left-to-right | right-to-left | bidirectional |
UniProtKB help_outline |
|
|||
EC numbers help_outline | ||||
Gene Ontology help_outline | ||||
KEGG help_outline | ||||
MetaCyc help_outline | ||||
Reactome help_outline |
Publications
-
The pH dependence of intramolecular electron transfer rates in sulfite oxidase at high and low anion concentrations.
Pacheco A., Hazzard J.T., Tollin G., Enemark J.H.
The individual rate constants for intramolecular electron transfer (IET) between the Mo(VI)Fe(II) and Mo(V)Fe(III) forms of chicken liver sulfite oxidase (SO) have been determined at a variety of pH values, and at high and low anion concentrations. Large anions such as EDTA do not inhibit IET as d ... >> More
The individual rate constants for intramolecular electron transfer (IET) between the Mo(VI)Fe(II) and Mo(V)Fe(III) forms of chicken liver sulfite oxidase (SO) have been determined at a variety of pH values, and at high and low anion concentrations. Large anions such as EDTA do not inhibit IET as dramatically as do small anions such as SO4(2-) and Cl-, which suggests that specific anion binding at the sterically constrained Mo active site is necessary for IET inhibition to occur.IET may require that SO adopt a conformation in which the Mo and Fe centers are held in close proximity by electrostatic interactions between the predominantly positively charged Mo active site, and the negatively charged heme edge. Thus, small anions which can fit into the Mo active site will weaken this electrostatic attraction and disfavor IET. The rate constant for IET from Fe(II) to Mo(VI) decreases with increasing pH, both in the presence and absence of 50 mM SO4(2-) . However, the rate constant for the reverse process exhibits no significant pH dependence in the absence of SO4(2-), and increases with pH in the presence of 50 mM S04(2-). This behavior is consistent with a mechanism in which IET from Mo(V) to Fe(III) is coupled to proton transfer from Mo(V)-OH to OH-, and the reverse IET process is coupled to proton transfer from H2O to Mo(VI) = O. At high concentrations of small anions, direct access of H2O or OH-to the Mo-OH will be blocked, which provides a second possible mechanism for inhibition of IET by such anions. Inhibition by anions is not strictly competitive, however, and Tyr322 may play an important intermediary role in transferring the proton when an anion blocks direct access of H2O or OH-to the Mo-OH. Competing H-bonding interactions of the Mo-OH moiety with Tyr322 and with the anion occupying the active site may also be responsible for the well-known equilibrium between two EPR-distinct forms of SO that is observed for the two-electron reduced enzyme. << Less
-
Chicken liver sulfite oxidase. Kinetics of reduction by laser-photoreduced flavins and intramolecular electron transfer.
Kipke C.A., Cusanovich M.A., Tollin G., Sunde R.A., Enemark J.H.
Laser flash photolysis was used to study the reaction of photoproduced 5-deazariboflavin (dRFH.), lumiflavin (LFH.), and riboflavin (RFH.) semiquinone radicals with the redox centers of purified chicken liver sulfite oxidase. Kinetic studies of the native enzyme with dRFH. yielded a second-order r ... >> More
Laser flash photolysis was used to study the reaction of photoproduced 5-deazariboflavin (dRFH.), lumiflavin (LFH.), and riboflavin (RFH.) semiquinone radicals with the redox centers of purified chicken liver sulfite oxidase. Kinetic studies of the native enzyme with dRFH. yielded a second-order rate constant of 4.0 X 10(8) M-1 s-1 for direct reduction of the heme and a first-order rate constant of 310 s-1 for intramolecular electron transfer from the Mo center to the heme. The reaction with LFH. gave a second-order rate constant of 2.9 X 10(7) M-1 s-1 for heme reduction. Reoxidation of the reduced heme due to intramolecular electron transfer to the Mo center gave a first-order rate constant of 155 s-1. The direction of intramolecular electron transfer using dRFH. and LFH. was independent of the buffer used for the experiment. The different first-order rate constants observed for intramolecular electron transfer using dRFH. and LFH. are proposed to result from chemical differences at the Mo site. Flash photolysis studies with cyanide-inactivated sulfite oxidase using dRFH. and LFH. resulted in second-order reduction of the heme center with rate constants identical with those obtained with the native enzyme, whereas the first-order intramolecular electron-transfer processes seen with the native enzyme were absent. The isolated heme peptide of sulfite oxidase gave only second-order kinetics upon laser photolysis and confirmed that the first-order processes observed with the native enzyme involve the Mo site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) << Less
-
The properties of sulfite oxidation in perfused rat liver; interaction of sulfite oxidase with the mitochondrial respiratory chain.
Oshino N., Chance B.
-
The 1.2 A structure of the human sulfite oxidase cytochrome b(5) domain.
Rudolph M.J., Johnson J.L., Rajagopalan K.V., Kisker C.
The molybdenum- and iron-containing enzyme sulfite oxidase catalyzes the physiologically vital oxidation of sulfite to sulfate. Sulfite oxidase contains three domains: an N-terminal cytochrome b(5) domain, a central domain harboring the molybdenum cofactor (Moco) and a C-terminal dimerization doma ... >> More
The molybdenum- and iron-containing enzyme sulfite oxidase catalyzes the physiologically vital oxidation of sulfite to sulfate. Sulfite oxidase contains three domains: an N-terminal cytochrome b(5) domain, a central domain harboring the molybdenum cofactor (Moco) and a C-terminal dimerization domain. Oxidation of the substrate sulfite is coupled to the transfer of two electrons to the molybdenum cofactor. Subsequently, these electrons are passed on, one at a time, to the b(5) heme of sulfite oxidase and from there to the soluble electron carrier cytochrome c. The crystal structure of the oxidized human sulfite oxidase cytochrome b(5) domain has been determined at 1.2 A resolution and has been refined to a crystallographic R factor of 0.107 (R(free) = 0.137). A comparison of this structure with other b(5)-type cytochromes reveals distinct structural features present in the sulfite oxidase b(5) domain which promote optimal electron transport between the Moco of sulfite oxidase and the heme of cytochrome c. << Less
-
QM/MM study of the reaction mechanism of sulfite oxidase.
Caldararu O., Feldt M., Cioloboc D., van Severen M.C., Starke K., Mata R.A., Nordlander E., Ryde U.
Sulfite oxidase is a mononuclear molybdenum enzyme that oxidises sulfite to sulfate in many organisms, including man. Three different reaction mechanisms have been suggested, based on experimental and computational studies. Here, we study all three with combined quantum mechanical (QM) and molecul ... >> More
Sulfite oxidase is a mononuclear molybdenum enzyme that oxidises sulfite to sulfate in many organisms, including man. Three different reaction mechanisms have been suggested, based on experimental and computational studies. Here, we study all three with combined quantum mechanical (QM) and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) methods, including calculations with large basis sets, very large QM regions (803 atoms) and QM/MM free-energy perturbations. Our results show that the enzyme is set up to follow a mechanism in which the sulfur atom of the sulfite substrate reacts directly with the equatorial oxo ligand of the Mo ion, forming a Mo-bound sulfate product, which dissociates in the second step. The first step is rate limiting, with a barrier of 39-49 kJ/mol. The low barrier is obtained by an intricate hydrogen-bond network around the substrate, which is preserved during the reaction. This network favours the deprotonated substrate and disfavours the other two reaction mechanisms. We have studied the reaction with both an oxidised and a reduced form of the molybdopterin ligand and quantum-refinement calculations indicate that it is in the normal reduced tetrahydro form in this protein. << Less
-
The kinetic behavior of chicken liver sulfite oxidase.
Brody M.S., Hille R.
A comprehensive kinetic study of sulfite oxidase has been undertaken over the pH range 6.0-10.0, including conventional steady-state work as well as rapid kinetic studies of both the reaction of oxidized enzyme with sulfite and reduced enzyme with cytochrome c (III). A comparison of the pH depende ... >> More
A comprehensive kinetic study of sulfite oxidase has been undertaken over the pH range 6.0-10.0, including conventional steady-state work as well as rapid kinetic studies of both the reaction of oxidized enzyme with sulfite and reduced enzyme with cytochrome c (III). A comparison of the pH dependence of kcat, kred, and kox indicates that kred is principally rate limiting above pH 7, but that below this pH the pH dependence of kcat is influenced by that of kox. The pH independence of kred is consistent with our previous proposal concerning the reaction mechanism, in which attack of the substrate lone pair of electrons on a Mo(VI)O2 unit initiates the catalytic sequence. The pH dependence of kred/Kdsulfite indicates that a group on the enzyme having a pKa of approximately 9.3 must be deprotonated for effective reaction of oxidized enzyme with sulfite, possibly Tyr 322, which from the crystal structure of the enzyme constitutes part of the substrate binding site. There is no evidence for the HSO3-/SO32-pKa of approximately 7 in the pH profile for kred/Kdsulfite, suggesting that enzyme is able to oxidize the two equally well. By contrast, kcat/Kmsulfite and kred/Kdsulfite exhibit distinct pH dependence (the former is bell-shaped, the latter sigmoidal), again consistent with the oxidative half-reaction contributing to the kinetic barrier to catalysis at low pH. The pH dependence of kcat/Km(cyt c) (reflecting the second-order rate of reaction of free enzyme with free cytochrome) is bell-shaped and closely resembles that of kox/Kd(cyt c), reflecting the importance of the oxidative half-reaction in the low substrate concentration regime. The pH profile for kox/Kd(cyt c) indicates that two groups with a pKa of approximately 8 are involved in the reaction of free reduced enzyme with cytochrome c, one of which must be deprotonated and the other protonated. These results are consistent with the known electrostatic nature of the interaction of cytochrome c with its physiological partners. << Less
-
Sulfite oxidizing enzymes.
Feng C., Tollin G., Enemark J.H.
Sulfite oxidizing enzymes are essential mononuclear molybdenum (Mo) proteins involved in sulfur metabolism of animals, plants and bacteria. There are three such enzymes presently known: (1) sulfite oxidase (SO) in animals, (2) SO in plants, and (3) sulfite dehydrogenase (SDH) in bacteria. X-ray cr ... >> More
Sulfite oxidizing enzymes are essential mononuclear molybdenum (Mo) proteins involved in sulfur metabolism of animals, plants and bacteria. There are three such enzymes presently known: (1) sulfite oxidase (SO) in animals, (2) SO in plants, and (3) sulfite dehydrogenase (SDH) in bacteria. X-ray crystal structures of enzymes from all three sources (chicken SO, Arabidopsis thaliana SO, and Starkeya novella SDH) show nearly identical square pyramidal coordination around the Mo atom, even though the overall structures of the proteins and the presence of additional cofactors vary. This structural information provides a molecular basis for studying the role of specific amino acids in catalysis. Animal SO catalyzes the final step in the degradation of sulfur-containing amino acids and is critical in detoxifying excess sulfite. Human SO deficiency is a fatal genetic disorder that leads to early death, and impaired SO activity is implicated in sulfite neurotoxicity. Animal SO and bacterial SDH contain both Mo and heme domains, whereas plant SO only has the Mo domain. Intraprotein electron transfer (IET) between the Mo and Fe centers in animal SO and bacterial SDH is a key step in the catalysis, which can be studied by laser flash photolysis in the presence of deazariboflavin. IET studies on animal SO and bacterial SDH clearly demonstrate the similarities and differences between these two types of sulfite oxidizing enzymes. Conformational change is involved in the IET of animal SO, in which electrostatic interactions may play a major role in guiding the docking of the heme domain to the Mo domain prior to electron transfer. In contrast, IET measurements for SDH demonstrate that IET occurs directly through the protein medium, which is distinctly different from that in animal SO. Point mutations in human SO can result in significantly impaired IET or no IET, thus rationalizing their fatal effects. The recent developments in our understanding of sulfite oxidizing enzyme mechanisms that are driven by a combination of molecular biology, rapid kinetics, pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and computational techniques are the subject of this review. << Less
Biochim Biophys Acta 1774:527-539(2007) [PubMed] [EuropePMC]
-
Structure of the active site of sulfite oxidase. X-ray absorption spectroscopy of the Mo(IV), Mo(V), and Mo(VI) oxidation states.
George G.N., Kipke C.A., Prince R.C., Sunde R.A., Enemark J.H., Cramer S.P.
The active site of sulfite oxidase has been investigated by X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the molybdenum K-edge at 4 K. We have investigated all three accessible molybdenum oxidation states, Mo(IV), Mo(V), and Mo(VI), allowing comparison with the Mo(V) electron paramagnetic resonance data for t ... >> More
The active site of sulfite oxidase has been investigated by X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the molybdenum K-edge at 4 K. We have investigated all three accessible molybdenum oxidation states, Mo(IV), Mo(V), and Mo(VI), allowing comparison with the Mo(V) electron paramagnetic resonance data for the first time. Quantitative analysis of the extended X-ray absorption fine structure indicates that the Mo(VI) oxidation state possesses two terminal oxo (Mo = O) and approximately three thiolate-like (Mo-S-) ligands and is unaffected by changes in pH and chloride concentration. The Mo(IV) and Mo(V) oxidation states, however, each have a single oxo ligand plus one Mo-O-(or Mo-N less than) bond, most probably Mo--OH, and two to three thiolate-like ligands. Both reduced forms appear to gain a single chloride ligand under conditions of low pH and high chloride concentration. << Less